Google And Facebook Ignore "Do Not Track" Requests, Claim They Confuse Consumers

How should a company respond if a consumer politely asks it to stop tracking his or her behavior on the company’s website?

Google raises privacy fears as personal details are released to app developers

Campaigner says tech giant's policies don't make it clear that Google Play users who buy apps give over information
Google could face a third privacy row in a two years, after a leading campaigner called for the US government to investigate the fact that the names, geographic region and email addresses of people who buy apps from its Play store are passed on to the app developers without users' explicit permission.
The company is also coming under pressure from developers who do not want it to send them that data, because they are concerned about its privacy implications.
Ben Edelman, an associate professor at Harvard Business School, says that analysis of Google's terms and conditions relating to its Google Play store and Google Wallet transaction system (used for buying apps) doesn't show any clauses where users are specifically told that their emails will be sent on to the developer.
He also warns that developers could use that information to "track and harass" people who have given apps low ratings or requested refunds. And hackers – or malicious developers – could create personalised emails to send out to people to steal passwords (phishing) or install "updates" that were actually malware.
Apple does not pass on any such information from its App Store when users buy or download apps – although Google's store has a different legal structure from its rival's. Users buy from Apple, for legal purposes; with Google, they are legally buying from the developer.
Google says it has to provide some location data about which country apps are bought in so developers can calculate the correct amount of tax to pay.
But that does not explain why it passes on buyers' names and email addresses, which together with a postcode could be used to identify a person's location and address.
"Google's prior privacy blunders have put [it] under higher scrutiny," Edelman says, pointing to the 20-year consent order with the US Federal Trade Commission that Google signed in March 2011 in the wake of its Buzz social network fiasco – followed by a record $22.5m fine in August 2012 for hacking Apple users' browsers to install tracking cookies. It has also been fiercely criticised in Europe for its changes in March 2012 to its privacy policies, which data protection chiefs said could mean "uncontrolled" use of personal data.
Eric Butler, a freelance software developer of the Tapchat and Farebot apps, tweeted in July 2012 "I wonder if most Android users realise that when you buy an app in the Play Store the seller [of the app] can see your name, email address and phone."
Following the row, he has noted on his blog that "Because the entire experience of purchasing Android apps is so sloppy, it's not unreasonable to assume that this privacy issue was actually an oversight." But, he says, "Google should follow Apple's lead and offer users and developers better privacy protection."
The release of the emails to developers was highlighted by Dan Moran, an Australian app developer, earlier in February – though Edelman points out that "at least three other developers had previously raised the same concern".
Another developer, Jesse Wilson, pointed out the same problem in November on Google+, and was quickly echoed by Chris Lacy, who said that "as a developer I never asked for this information, I have no need for it, and I simply do not want to be a custodian of such information."
Lacy added that "As a consumer, this is distressing on many levels: there is no fair warning that this information will be transferred … trusting my personal information to Google is one thing. But with this system, users are unknowingly having to trust their information to a third party. There's no way to know what security measures that third party might have in place." He added that it meant that the app developer "has gained my personal information without requesting the appropriate permissions via the app."
Google has said that passing on the details does not breach its privacy conditions. In a quote to Siliconvalley.com, a representative told the site that "Google Wallet shares the information necessary to process a transaction, which is clearly spelled out in the Google Wallet privacy notice."
But Edelman disputes that. "First, it simply is not 'necessary' to provide developers with access to customer names or email addresses in order to process customer transactions … To claim that it is 'necessary' to provide this information to developers, Google would need to establish that there is truly no alternative – a high bar, which Google has not even attempted to reach. Second, this data sharing is not 'spelled out in the Google Wallet privacy notice' and certainly is not 'clear' there."
He added that the idea that the developer is the "merchant of record" for the transaction is contradicted by the fact that the transaction is carried out with Google itself, through Google Wallet – and that repayments too come via Google. "If it has 'Google' as the company you do the transaction with, not the developer, then it seems logical that Google is the merchant of record," he told the Guardian.

guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

French Tax Proposal Tackles Data Harvest by Google and Facebook

Google and Facebook know that John Doe “likes” wine, is shopping for a Volkswagen and often e-mails Jane Doe. Soon, in France, they might have to pay for gathering that information.

Google unveils touchscreen laptop

Google has unveiled its first touchscreen-enabled laptop, the Chromebook Pixel.

Google bug returns porn for mathematical queries

A bug in Google search — fortunately, a rare one — gives porn links and images as results when the user puts certain mathematical equations into the search box. It's certainly strange, but there is an explanation.

The (Not So) Evil Strategy Behind Everything Google

Search strategist AJ Kohn has written one of the clearest explanations of Google's motivations—without ascribing evil! On his blog, Blind Five Year Old (the random sounding name actually refers to "a specific search engine optimization (SEO) philosophy – to treat search engines like they are blind five year olds"), Kohn explains the company's strategy in its simplest terms, "Get people to use the Internet more."

Google Makes Offer in 3-Year European Antitrust Case

The company had until Thursday night to submit the proposals to end a three-year investigation focused on the dominance of its search service.

YouTube's hilarious cat videos could soon cost you $5 a month

Ad giant Google 'experiments' with paid-for subscriptions
YouTube is reportedly "experimenting" with the idea of charging people to watch some of the videos on its website.…

Google submits remedy proposals to EU antitrust chief - ICOMP

11th hour response from Mountain View, apparently
Updated Google has submitted a new round of proposals to the competition wing of the European Commission, which has fingered the search giant for possible "dominance abuse", according to ICOMP.…

Google iPhone tracking: more than 70 users contact lawyers

Tech giant faces group privacy claim after it allegedly sidestepped Apple security settings
More than 70 Apple iPhone users in the UK have joined a landmark privacy action against Google over the way it tracked their online habits, and another 30 have expressed interest, lawyers said on Tuesday.
The internet giant is facing a group privacy claim over the way it sidestepped Apple's security settings on the iPhone, iPad and desktop versions of its Safari web browser to monitor their behaviour. The US Federal Trade Commission fined it a then-record $22.5m (£14m) last year over the privacy breach's effect on American users.
More than 100 internet users have contracted the law firm Olswang, which is co-ordinating the claim, since Sunday to register their interest in joining the privacy action. A Facebook group set up by those suing Google, called Safari Users Against Google's Secret Tracking, has been "liked" by more than 430 people.
Dan Tench, the lawyer coordinating the claims, told the Guardian: "We've had more than 70 people come forward to join this action. We are seeking further details in respect of these individuals' cases and, where appropriate, will be making further claims for them against Google."
The litigation is the first group privacy claim against Google in the UK and could run up a significant legal bill for the search company. An estimated 10 million Britons owned iPhones, which use Safari as the default browser and Google as the search engine, between summer 2011 and spring 2012, when the breach is believed to have occurred.
Google has admitted it intentionally sidestepped security settings on Apple's Safari web browser which blocked websites from tracking users through cookies – data stored on users' computers that show which sites they have visited. Security researchers revealed in February 2012 that Google's DoubleClick advertising network intentionally stored these cookies on users' computers without their consent.
The search giant is no stranger to damaging privacy issues after rows over its Google Buzz social network and the collection of data from Wi-Fi networks. It agreed to a 20-year oversight of its privacy methods after Google Buzz revealed users details to each other against their wishes.
Lawyers for claimants in the UK have ordered Google to reveal how it used the private information it secretly obtained, how much personal data was taken, and for how long. It is understood the claimants are suing Google for breaches of confidence and breach of privacy, computer misuse and trespass, and breach of the Data Protection Act 1998.
Google declined to comment. A statement it released at the time of the $22.5m fine last July claimed it had "collected no personal information" with the cookies

Zuck on it, Google: 'Public' Facebook events are dead to you

No more free rides, you gotta sign up to see... bitch
Exclusive Facebook is squirrelling away search results about its users' public events that could once be easily found through Google, The Register has learned.…

Orange boasts: We made Google PAY US for mobile traffic

Some packets are more neutral than others ...
France Telecom-Orange is making a wad of cash from Google, the company's CEO boasted in an interview with French media yesterday.…

Beware the Google convenience store

PhD students are foregoing primary sources in favour of electronic journal articles and as a result are limiting their analytical abilities, writes Roly Keating

Rogue Google SSL certificate not used for dishonest purposes, Turktrust says

Turktrust, the Turkish CA (certificate authority) responsible for issuing an intermediate CA certificate that was later used to generate an unauthorized certificate for google.com, claims that the bad Google certificate was not used for dishonest purposes.

Cyber thieves impersonate Google+

Net criminals have exploited a security lapse to pose as part of the Google+ social media service in a bid to steal confidential data.

Google agrees to not abuse mobile patents, search ads, or search results

To head off further investigation by the Federal Trade Commission and risk penalties from a negative finding, Google today agreed to change some of its business practices to resolve FTC concerns around practices the commission thought could stifle competition for smartphones, tablets, and gaming consoles, as well as for online search advertising.

Presidente da Google anuncia visita à Coreia do Norte

O presidente executivo da Google, Eric Schmidt, vai integrar uma missão humanitária à Coreia do Norte liderada pelo antigo governador norte-americano do Novo México Bill Richardson, revelou hoje a Associated...

Google given a month to wriggle out of Euro antitrust smackdown

Ad giant must persuade rivals it isn't cheating in search
Google must convince its rivals that it competes fairly in the web search market or else face sanctions for alleged "abuse of dominance", a European watchdog warned today. And the clock is ticking.…

Bankrupt Kodak gets $525m lifeline

Eastman Kodak sells its digital imaging patents to a consortium of investors, including Google and Apple, for $525m (£322m).

Google to Microsoft: Up yours

Last week, to hear the press tell it, Google went on a rampage against Microsoft.